Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Chlorhexidine Gluconate-Containing Dressings in Reducing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections, Hospital Stay, and Costs.

Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-containing dressings are recommended to prevent central line associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and other catheter-related infections. This study compared the effect of 2 CHG dressings on CLABSI, cost of care, and contact dermatitis. A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Premier Healthcare Database of hospitalized patients (n = 53 149) with central venous catheters (CVCs) and receiving either a transparent CHG gel dressing (n = 14 488) or an opaque CHG sponge dressing (n = 38 661) between January 2019 and September 2020. Two cohorts (n = 14 488 each), CHG-Gel and CHG-Sponge, were matched 1:1 using a propensity score method on 33 patient and facility characteristics. CLABSI and contact dermatitis rates, hospital length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs were compared using mixed-effect multiple regression. This approach effectively controlled for random clustering effects across hospitals and patients' Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) classifications. CHG gel dressings were associated with a 41% decrease in CLABSI rates (P = .0008) compared to CHG sponge dressings (0.35%vs 0.60%). A 0.4-day shorter LOS (9.53vs 9.90 days, P = .0001) and a cost saving of $3576 per hospital stay ($40 197 vs $43 774, P = .0179) was observed with CHG gel dressing use. There was no statistically significant difference in contact dermatitis rates (P = .7854) between the CHG-Gel and CHG-Sponge cohorts. The findings of this study suggest that the use of CHG gel dressings may be more effective in reducing the risk of CLABSIs and associated clinical costs compared to CHG sponge dressings in hospitalized patients. Moreover, there appears to be no significant discrepancy in contact dermatitis rates between CHG gel and CHG sponge dressings. Healthcare providers may consider using CHG gel dressings as a standard practice for patients with CVCs to reduce the risk of infections and improve patient outcomes.

Corrigendum to "Incidence and impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and cost of care for patients undergoing open procedures" [Surg Open Sci (2023) 1-18/ISSN 2589-8450].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.10.004.].

Incidence and impact of surgical site complications on length of stay and cost of care for patients undergoing open procedures.

Background: Surgical site complications (SSCs) can have serious and life-threatening consequences for patients; however, their frequency and impact on healthcare utilization across surgical procedures, particularly for non-infectious SSCs, are unknown. This study examined incidence of overall SSCs and non-infectious SSCs in patients undergoing open surgical procedures in the United States and their effect on length of stay (LOS) and costs. Methods: This retrospective study utilizing 2019-2020 data from Medicare and Premier Health Database identified patients with SSCs during hospitalization or within 90 days of discharge. Propensity score matching was used to calculate incremental LOS and costs attributable to SSCs. Mean LOS and costs attributable to SSCs for the index admission, readmissions, and outpatient visits were summed by procedure and Charlson Comorbidity Index score to estimate the overall impact of an SSC on LOS and costs across healthcare settings. Results: Overall and non-infectious SSC rates were 7.3 % and 5.3 % respectively for 2,696,986 Medicare and 6.7 % and 5.0 % for 1,846,254 Premier open surgeries. Total incremental LOS and cost per SSC were 7.8 days and $15,339 for Medicare patients and 6.2 days and $17,196 for Premier patients. Incremental LOS and cost attributable to non-infectious SSCs were 6.5 days and $12,703 and 5.2 days and $14,477 for Medicare and Premier patients respectively. Conclusions: This study utilizing two large national databases provides strong evidence that SSCs, particularly non-infectious SSCs, are not uncommon in open surgeries and result in increased healthcare utilization and costs. These findings demonstrate the need for increased adoption of evidence-based interventions that can reduce SSC rates.

Effectiveness of Disinfecting Caps for Intravenous Access Points in Reducing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections, Clinical Utilization, and Cost of Care During COVID-19.

Purpose: Intravenous (IV) access point protectors, serving as passive disinfection devices and a cover between line accesses, are available to help reduce the risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). This low-maintenance disinfection solution is particularly valuable in situations with excessive workloads. This study examined the effect of a disinfecting cap for an IV access point on CLABSI rates, hospital length of stay, and cost of care in an inpatient setting during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: The study utilized data from the Premier Healthcare Database, focusing on 200,411 hospitalizations involving central venous catheters between January 2020 and September 2020. Among these cases, 7423 patients received a disinfecting cap, while 192,988 patients did not use any disinfecting caps and followed the standard practice of hub scrubbing. The two cohorts, Disinfecting Cap and No-Disinfecting Cap groups, were compared in terms of CLABSI rates, hospital length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs. The analysis accounted for baseline group differences and random clustering effects by employing a 34-variable propensity score and mixed-effect multiple regression, respectively. Results: The findings demonstrated a significant 73% decrease in CLABSI rates (p= 0.0013) in the Disinfecting Cap group, with an adjusted CLABSI rate of 0.3% compared to 1.1% in the No-Disinfecting Cap group. Additionally, the Disinfecting Cap group exhibited a 0.5-day reduction in hospital stay (9.2 days versus 9.7 days; p = 0.0169) and cost savings of $6703 ($35,604 versus $42,307; p = 0.0063) per hospital stay compared to the No-Disinfecting Cap group. Conclusion: This study provides real-world evidence that implementing a disinfecting cap to protect IV access points effectively reduces the risk of CLABSIs in hospitalized patients compared to standard care, ultimately optimizing the utilization of healthcare resources, particularly in situations where the healthcare system is under significant strain or overloaded.

Incidence and impact of surgical site infections on length of stay and cost of care for patients undergoing open procedures.

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality; however, current SSI rates across open procedures and their effect on healthcare delivery are unknown. The objective of this study was to examine incidence of SSIs for open surgical procedures in the United States and impact on length of stay (LOS) and costs. Methods: This retrospective study utilizing 2019-2020 data from Medicare and Premier identified patients with SSIs occurring during hospitalization or within 90 days of discharge. Propensity score matching was used to calculate incremental LOS and costs attributable to SSIs. Mean LOS and costs attributable to SSIs for the index admission, readmissions, and outpatient visits were summed by procedure and Charlson Comorbidity Index score to estimate the overall impact of an SSI on LOS and costs across healthcare settings. Results: SSI rates were 2.0% for 2,696,986 Medicare and 1.8% for 1,846,254 Premier open surgeries. Total incremental LOS and cost per SSI, including index admission, readmissions, and outpatient visits were 9.3 days and $18,626 for Medicare patients and 7.8 days and $20,979 for Premier patients. SSI rates were higher for urgent/emergency surgeries compared to overall SSI rates. Although less common that superficial SSIs, deep SSIs resulted in higher incremental LOS and index costs for the index admission and for SSI-related readmissions. Conclusions: This study of SSIs utilizing two large national databases provides robust data and analytics reinforcing and bolstering current evidence that SSIs occur infrequently but are detrimental to patients in terms of increased LOS and care costs.

Medical students' learning orientation regarding interracial interactions affects preparedness to care for minority patients: a report from Medical Student CHANGES.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of evidence on how to train medical students to provide equitable, high quality care to racial and ethnic minority patients. We test the hypothesis that medical schools' ability to foster a learning orientation toward interracial interactions (i.e., that students can improve their ability to successfully interact with people of another race and learn from their mistakes), will contribute to white medical students' readiness to care for racial minority patients. We then test the hypothesis that white medical students who perceive their medical school environment as supporting a learning orientation will benefit more from disparities training. METHODS: Prospective observational study involving web-based questionnaires administered during first (2010) and last (2014) semesters of medical school to 2394 white medical students from a stratified, random sample of 49 U.S. medical schools. Analysis used data from students' last semester to build mixed effects hierarchical models in order to assess the effects of medical school interracial learning orientation, calculated at both the school and individual (student) level, on key dependent measures. RESULTS: School differences in learning orientation explained part of the school difference in readiness to care for minority patients. However, individual differences in learning orientation accounted for individual differences in readiness, even after controlling for school-level learning orientation. Individual differences in learning orientation significantly moderated the effect of disparities training on white students' readiness to care for minority patients. Specifically, white medical students who perceived a high level of learning orientation in their medical schools regarding interracial interactions benefited more from training to address disparities. CONCLUSIONS: Coursework aimed at reducing healthcare disparities and improving the care of racial minority patients was only effective when white medical students perceived their school as having a learning orientation toward interracial interactions. Results suggest that medical school faculty should present interracial encounters as opportunities to practice skills shown to reduce bias, and faculty and students should be encouraged to learn from one another about mistakes in interracial encounters. Future research should explore aspects of the medical school environment that contribute to an interracial learning orientation.